Sir R. Ross and I.M.S.

with the writer who immediately allowed his name to be published, as may be seen by a reference to our columns (May 1911, p. 187). This letter has long been lost, but at the time we stated and we still believe that it contained nothing beyond a statement to the effect that the writer should give his name. This having been done, we did not think it necessary to publish the letter itself, and not having the letter we cannot do so now. We are very sorry to have offended Sir Ronald in this matter. We may not always agree with him as to the ease or applicability to Indian